Article
Construction Cashflow 101: Progress Claims, Retentions And Funding Gaps
A plain‑English guide to progress claims, retentions and cashflow gaps in Australian construction, plus funding options tradies and builders can act on this week.
Key Takeaway
Construction working capital finance helps Australian builders and tradies bridge cashflow gaps created by progress claims, retentions and delayed payments, which can easily run 30–90 days. By mapping weekly cash in and out on each project, then stress‑testing for 20–30% cost overruns and slow payers, owners can size an overdraft, invoice finance or project facility safely. The key actionable insight is to match funding terms and security to job duration and risk, rather than relying on personal home-loan redraw or offsets.
Watch the short answer
Finance options for subcontractors waiting 60 days to be paid
If you’re mapping your cashflow around progress claims and retentions, this video walks through finance options for 60 day payment terms.
Read the transcript
If you're a subcontractor waiting 60 days for a head contractor to clear your invoices, you are actively freezing your own borrowing power. Bleeding your liquid cash to float materials and payroll ruins your deposit structure for property loans. We utilise specialised commercial cash flow lines that allow you to draw funding directly against your uncompleted contract milestones. You get your cash in 24 hours, keeping your liquidity high and your home loan capacity protected. DM me, 'UNCLOG', to secure your invoice lines this week.
General information only, not personal advice. Your situation is assessed before any recommendation.
Construction working capital finance helps builders and tradies cover wages, suppliers and subcontractors while waiting to be paid on progress claims and retentions, usually over 30–90 days. The aim is to fund that gap with purpose‑built business facilities, not your home loan redraw or personal offset, so trading risk doesn’t land on the family home.
If you’re running jobs now, your priority this week is simple: map your actual cash gap per project, then decide whether an overdraft, invoice finance or specialist progress‑claim facility is the best fit.
Mapping progress claims against costs shows the real funding gap on each job.
1. How construction working capital really behaves
1.1 The construction cashflow pattern
Compared with many industries, construction has three extra stress points:
- Front‑loaded costs – mobilisation, deposits to suppliers, insurances and site establishment before the first claim.
- Progress claims – typically monthly, often certified by a superintendent or client before payment.
- Retentions – 2–10% of each claim withheld until practical completion, then end of defect period.
That means you can be profitable on paper but cash‑poor in reality. As outlined in /insights/industry-specific-working-capital-patterns-risks, project‑based businesses like builders must size working capital around the worst month, not the average year.
1.2 Typical timing in Australia
While every contract differs, a common pattern is:
- Payment terms: 30 days from claim approval, but 45–60 days in practice.
- Retentions: 5% total (2.5% until practical completion, 2.5% until end of defects liability period, say 12 months).
- Variations: often disputed or delayed.
Layer in the APRA 3% home‑loan serviceability buffer and rising input costs (the ABS Producer Price Index for construction is still running above general inflation), and personal and business resilience become tightly linked.
2. Progress claims, retentions and the real cash gap
2.1 Worked example: a $1.2m contract
Assume a builder wins a $1.2m (ex‑GST) project, expected to run 9 months, with:
- 5% retention (2.5% at practical completion, 2.5% at 12 months)
- Monthly claims based on work done
- 30‑day terms, but paid on average 45 days after claim
Rough cash profile (simplified):
| Month | Cumulative costs paid (A$) | Cumulative claims approved (A$) | Retentions held (A$) | Cash position vs costs* |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 120,000 | 100,000 | 5,000 | -25,000 |
| 3 | 400,000 | 350,000 | 17,500 | -67,500 |
| 6 | 800,000 | 750,000 | 37,500 | -87,500 |
| 9 | 1,150,000 | 1,140,000 | 57,000 | +47,000 |
| 21** | 1,200,000 | 1,200,000 | 0 | +0 |
*Assumes claims are eventually paid in full; ignores overheads. **End of 12‑month defects period.
Even with no blowouts, this builder needs capacity to fund at least $90k–$100k of gap on this one job, plus overheads and any other projects. If material prices jump 15% mid‑project, that gap can widen fast.
The strategy continues below
You've seen the problem and the groundwork — now unlock the exact steps our CPA and Registered Tax Agent-led brokers use, including 4 more sections. Enter your email for instant, free full access.
Free access. No spam — unsubscribe anytime. Your details stay confidential.
Frequently asked questions
How do progress claims affect my working capital needs?▾
What is retention money and why is it risky for cashflow?▾
Is invoice finance suitable for small tradies?▾
Should I secure my construction working capital against my home?▾
How much buffer should a builder keep outside working capital?▾
Request a strategy call
Confidential consultation with a triple-qualified advisor — commercial, SMSF, equipment and development finance.
